The debate about chiropractic
For a primer on chiropractic see: Sense About Chiropractic by Professor Edzard Ernst
For a response from the British Chiropractic Association see: The British Chiropractic Association presented its evidence that chiropractic is useful for certain childhood ailments on 17th June 2009. Read it here.
The following bloggers have examined the evidence presented by the BCA (Sense About Science has not studied all these external sites thoroughly):
For an overview on how to analyse the evidence:
Dr Petra Boynton: An overview and guide on how to analyse the papers
Holford Watch: What would constitute good evidence?
The Lay Scientist: A general overview of the quality of the evidence
For a discussion of the papers: Gimpy’s blog: A review of the ear infection papers
Professor David Colquhoun: A detailed look at the nine colic papers
Ministry of Truth: A general review focusing on three of the colic papers
Evidence Matters: A review of the paediatric asthma papers
Apgaylard: A review of the bed-wetting papers
For general commentary:
Jack of Kent: General commentary and legal background
Nature blog The Great Beyond: A roundup of the evidence and the coverage
jdc325’s Weblog: General comment on the BCA statement
Phil Plaits Bad Astronomy blog: An overview of the BCA statement and aftermath
Think Logic: General comment on the BCA statement
Zeno’s Blog: A look at the BCA’s quote-mining of the GCC code
Last updated: October 07 2009
